Thursday, December 27, 2012

Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura Brain Invaders S03E07

Sharon_MNLawlessAmerica_JessieVentura_BrainInvaders

Jessie as former MN Gov knows where the "Bodies" are Buried, With Respect that any person who takes on the Corrupt Government must further assist with www.lawlessamerica.com www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com All I know is Jessie is  Benefiting Concerned Veterans for America,
Affiant is victim of Medical Malpractice Glaucoma EyeDrops Travaton Dangerous goes to Brain, utilized in the Kidneys and can lead to Death. Thanks Jessie to be out there re: Brain PTSD_Injury's VA etc.See More
Ventura’s “Brain Invaders”
www.veteranstoday.com
Jesse Ventura Takes on Government Mind Control ---- By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor --- Ventura takes on what we have...
 
http://www.youtube.com/user/lawlessamerica/videos?query=minnesota
minnesota":     
  •  
 

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Bahl v. County of Ramsey, et al :: Eighth Circuit :: US Courts of Appeals Cases :: US Federal Case Law :: US Case Law :: US Law :: Justia

Bahl v. County of Ramsey, et al :: Eighth Circuit :: US Courts of Appeals Cases :: US Federal Case Law :: US Case Law :: US Law :: Justia

Justia.com Opinion Summary: Plaintiff appealed the district court's order granting the City of St. Paul's motion for summary judgment and dismissing his disability discrimination claims brought against the City under the anti-discrimination provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12132; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. 794; the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), Minn. Stat. 363A.12, as well as his claim for negligence. The court affirmed the district court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the City on plaintiff's claims regarding the traffic stop and plaintiff's claims regarding the statement of charges. Because a reasonable jury could conclude that a public service had been initiated and was stopped due to plaintiff's disability, the court reversed and remanded for further proceedings on the post-arrest claim. The court reversed the district court's grant of summary judgment on the City's request for vicarious official liability with respect to the post-arrest interview. Finally, the court affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment on the negligence per se claim.

Receive FREE Daily Opinion Summaries by Email